Deliberations begin for Paul Flores in Kristin Smart murder trial

SALINAS, Calif. – Defense Attorney Robert Sanger wrapped up his closing arguments for Paul Flores on Tuesday in the Kristin Smart murder demo, recapping all the proof presented by the prosecution.

Eventually, he claimed there is no proof to convict Paul Flores.

Paul Flores is accused of killing Smart, who was a 19-calendar year-old Cal Poly scholar at the time of her disappearance in Could 1996, and Ruben Flores, Paul’s father, is remaining billed as an accent to the criminal offense.

Sanger talked about the witnesses, what he named the “scientific evidence, but no proof was included,” and a recap of what transpired the evening Good disappeared.

He also outlined the blood soil samples and explained “there is no validation review for ‘hem’ direct soil.”

The defense attorney consistently reminded the jurors that whatsoever legal professionals say, they will say it in fantastic hope.

But in the long run it is the jury’s final decision.

Sanger wrapped up by declaring that what’s crucial are the information and the legislation, and that the prosecution has a stress to get over this innocence due to the fact Kristin Smart’s human body has not been identified.

Sanger concluded and mentioned “the only proper verdict is not guilty.”

Deputy District Legal professional Chris Puevrelle then proceeded with a rebuttal.

Puevrelle explained the defense workforce stated the prosecution’s scenario is only conspiracy.

The Deputy District Attorney explained Sanger is absurd to have the jury consider 50 witnesses are involved in a grand conspiracy, 6 canine are on it and even the media is on it.

Puevrelle ongoing on to discuss about the proof and the night time Wise disappeared, expressing that the jury had to see issues no human staying should.

Puevrelle stated “there is no question Kristin Sensible was dead.”

He mentioned that in get to find Paul Flores not responsible, the jury would have to feel that a serial rapist took Kristin Wise by himself to his dorm place, by herself, and let her go and dwell her daily life.

Puevrelle continued to say that each witness was insulted up at the stand.

He concluded and claimed “sometimes we explain to our little ones monsters do not exist, and that’s not accurate, we have noticed one particular in this demo.”

Protection Lawyer Robert Sanger positioned a movement for a mistrial, but Choose Jennifer O’Keefe denied it.

O’Keefe then proceeded with providing Paul Flores’ jury two verdict types – 1 is responsible and the other is not guilty – and she reminded the jury to not wait to modify their thoughts, but to retain an open up thoughts.

She also asked the jury to not speak about the scenario or any variety of media connected to the circumstance.

The only time the jury can chat about the scenario is in the course of deliberations.

Paul Flores’ jury was dismissed for deliberation all over 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday afternoon.

Jury directions proceeded by Choose O’Keefe.

Closing arguments for Ruben Flores will commence on Wednesday morning.